Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on musical and sensory ethnography across Tunisia, this article explores the interconnected dimensions of jaww, a complex musico-cultural concept encompassing atmosphere, social environment, climate, and mood. For both performers and listeners, jaww functions as: (1) a connection between the air of different settings across time and space, (2) a conduit for the transmission of privileged musical knowledge, (3) an immersive, multisensory medium infused with sounds, smells, and spirits; and (4) a pervasive intersubjective feeling. While special attention is given to the jaww of ma’lūf (Tunisian-Andalusian music), the atmospheres of other Tunisian musical traditions are also considered. The role of jaww in evoking nostalgia is examined within the broader context of Andalusi musics, and comparisons are drawn with related North African and Middle Eastern concepts such as ṭarab (musical ecstasy) and ḥāl (spiritual or emotional state). Finally, the article considers how region, descent, social class, and national identity shape the musical experience of jaww.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".