MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Wind power forecasting: A hybrid multi-layer perceptron framework with adaptive noise reduction and error correction

2025· article· en· W4414172042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Electrical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise (video)Reduction (mathematics)Control theory (sociology)Noise reductionWind powerPower (physics)Perceptron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing penetration of renewables introduces unprecedented volatility into modern power systems. Conventional forecasting frameworks often treat residual variations as unstructured noise, discarding them after correction. These approaches neglect the physical reality that residuals capture short-term disturbances, intermittency effects, and hidden fluctuations that directly affect grid stability and reliability. In this work, we propose a high-order Kalman filtering framework in which residuals are explicitly modeled as dynamic states with their own stochastic evolution. Rather than being treated as disposable errors, residuals are elevated to predictive components, enabling a simultaneous decomposition of system behavior into long-term operational trends and fast-changing renewable-driven fluctuations. The framework integrates innovation-driven covariance adaptation, allowing the filter to continuously recalibrate its process and measurement uncertainties under nonstationary grid conditions (e.g. fluctuating wind power, sudden load changes). In addition, a dual-stage neural network architecture is introduced to capture the smooth trajectory of the system state, and model high-frequency corrections. A real-time adaptive weighting strategy balances their influence, ensuring robustness both in stable operation and during disturbances triggered by renewable variability. Extensive simulations on wind power and speed datasets validate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The framework reduced mean absolute error (MAE) from 0.82 (trend based-multilayer perceptron, TMLP) and 0.88 (residual-based multilayer perceptron, RMLP) to 0.48 on the test data, representing over 40 % improvement. On the test wind speed dataset, MAE was reduced from 0.92 (TMLP) and 0.98 (RMLP) to 0.81, corresponding to gains of 14.68 % improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it