MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414229444 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3610346

Autonomous Mobile Robot Design and Testing for Data Center Monitoring Mission

2025· article· en· W4414229444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstacleMobile robotRobotObstacle avoidanceData centerMobile robot navigationTrajectoryAutomationLidar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a cost-effective autonomous mobile robot (AMR) designed for remote data center monitoring, motivated by the need to enhance operational efficiency and reduce human intervention in critical infrastructure. The proposed model integrates a TurtleBot Kobuki base with a novel SRF10-based virtual bumper system, RPLIDAR scanner, and GoPro camera, enabling autonomous navigation, obstacle avoidance, and high-resolution photo capture in data center corridors. Developed through a university-industrial collaboration, the prototype leverages ROS-compatible subroutines to minimize development costs. Laboratory and real-world tests validate the AMR’s performance, achieving 92% navigation success and 94.2% gap navigation accuracy, while identifying limitations like positioning errors and low-clearance obstacle detection. Proposed upgrades, including a faster LIDAR and enhanced computing power, aim to meet industrial standards. This study establishes a foundation for scalable, automated monitoring solutions across data centers and similar sectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it