Surviving Armageddon (aka COVID-19) through "Good Omens: Lockdown" fan fiction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In May 2020, Neil Gaiman and some of the team behind Good Omens (2019–2025) created a YouTube video titled "Good Omens: Lockdown" ("Lockdown"). In this video, the demon Crowley (David Tennant) and the angel Aziraphale (Michael Sheen) have a phone conversation discussing the pandemic and the importance of following the current UK health guidance. "Lockdown" inspired a large amount of fan fiction. I chose a sample of sixteen of the most popular stories in order to examine how fans transformed aspects of the video in ways that may give insight into and comment on potential fissures in the messaging. The analysis revealed that many fan writers actively resisted the normative, prescriptive health messaging of "Lockdown" and instead worked to make the messaging personal and inclusive of complex situational intersections, such as queer identity and mental health struggles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it