MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414362919 · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ae093e

Somatotopic non-invasive proprioceptive feedback strategy for prosthetic hands: a preliminary study

2025· article· en· W4414362919 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Physics & Engineering Express · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGRASPNeuroprostheticsProprioceptionProsthetic handNeural ProsthesisSensory systemControllabilityCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. Robotic hand prosthesis users often identify the lack of physiological feedback as a major obstacle to seamless integration. Both the low controllability and high cognitive load required to operate these devices generally lead to their rejection. Consequently, experts highlight sensory feedback as a critical missing features of commercial prostheses. Providing feedback that promotes the integration of artificial limbs is often sought through a biomimetic paradigm, limited by the current technological landscape and the absence of neural embodiment in users. As a result, some researchers are now turning to bio-inspired approaches, choosing to repurpose existing neural structures and focusing on underlying neurocognitive mechanisms that promote the integration of artificial inputs. Approach. Taking a bio-inspired approach, this paper describes the first implementation of a somatotopic, non-invasive proprioceptive feedback strategy for hand prosthesis users, developed using a standard sensory restoration architecture, i.e. pre-processing, encoding and stimulation. The main hypothesis investigated is whether a novel use of transcutaneous electrical stimulation can be leveraged to deliver proprioceptive information of the hand to the user. Main results. The potential of the proposed strategy was highlighted via experimental validation in conveying specific finger apertures and grasp types related to single and multiple degrees of freedom. Six participants were able to identify apertures conveyed by median and ulnar nerve stimulation with an accuracy of 96.5% ± 2.3% and a response time of 0.91 s ± 0.08 s, as well as grasp types conveyed from concurrent median and ulnar nerve stimulation with an accuracy of 88.3% ± 1.2% and a response time of 0.44 s ± 0.27 s through 5 sets of 10 trials. Significance. These results demonstrate the relevance of a somatotopic proprioception feedback strategy for users of prosthetic hands, and the architecture presented in this case study allows for future optimization of the various sub-components.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it