MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414435637 · doi:10.1093/tas/txaf129

Application of DNA parentage testing and EnVigour HX™ to evaluate bull prolificacy and heifer performance in beef cattle breeding programs in Western Canada

2025· article· en· W4414435637 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSaskatchewan Cattlemen's AssociationMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsSireIce calvingCrossbreedBeef cattleFertilityLongevityReproductionProgeny testing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The use of multi-sire breeding pastures is a common practice in Western Canada for beef cattle management. However, the number of progenies sired by each bull may not be known or producers will not be sure if performance traits were passed on. Hybrid vigor is defined as the superiority of crossbred progeny over their parents’ average to increase production efficiency, longevity and reproductive rate of beef cows. A DNA parentage test was performed to identify relative sires to their progeny. Then, 109 bull prolificacy indexes (BPI) were calculated for 46 sires over 6 breeding seasons (some had more than one BPI). They ranged from 0.04 to 3.47, with values larger than one showing high prolific sires. Yearling sires had a significantly lower BPI value than 2-year-old and mature bulls. Regardless of the level of BPI, each sire produced the majority of all his born calves in the first cycle of the calving period (R2 = 0.89). This demonstrated the importance of identifying high BPI sires, as they showed a tendency to have a greater percentage of the first cycle born grand calves from their first cycle born heifers (R2 = 0.86). Also, they produced a greater number of grand calves from their retained daughters with a significant impact on total kg weaned (P < 0.01). The EnVigour HX™ test was applied to estimate the effect of bulls’ and heifers’ vigor scores (scores were based on percentage) on fertility and production traits. The breeder’s interest in the utilization of crossbred heifers and bulls positively affected the longevity of replacement females. There was a decrease in age at first calving relative to the EnVigour HX™ test commercialized suggestions per 10% increase in heifers’ vigor scores. Moreover, larger productivity was observed for average WW per calf and cow life productivity, which could be due to different genomic breed compositions between this study and the test animals. Overall, DNA parentage and EnVigour HX™ tests are essential tools for beef cattle production profitability. However, up to a 75% vigor score cutoff is suggested when selecting crossbred females with EnVigour HX™ to retain production and fertility efficiency in crossing with Beef Booster bulls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it