Assessing the Impact of Wildfire Emissions on the Seasonal Cycle of CO and Emergency Room Visits in Alberta and Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exposure to wildfire smoke is a well-known concern for public health and is anticipated to worsen with an increase in wildfire activity related to climate change. This study uses satellite and ground-based carbon monoxide (CO) measurements from 2004 to 2019 to evaluate a change in its seasonal cycle due to wildfire emissions. Monthly average CO total columns from the Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) satellite instrument over Alberta and Ontario, and from a ground-based Fourier transform infrared spectrometer in downtown Toronto are compared before and after 1 January 2012, following previous literature. Between the two time periods, a new peak emerges in the seasonal cycle of CO, centered around August. Monthly emergency room admissions from Alberta and Ontario for nine cardiovascular and respiratory diseases are assessed with a difference in difference analysis, using MOPITT CO as the exposure metric. This analysis was used to calculate the change in monthly hospital admissions per 100,000 people, given a 1 ppb increase in XCO post-2012 compared to pre-2012, along with the 95% confidence interval (CI). For Ontario, this term is positive and significant for hypertension (change = 1.88, CI = 1.18-2.57), ischemic heart disease (0.50, CI = 0.12-0.88), arrhythmia (0.12, CI = 0.03-0.22), and asthma (0.31, CI = 0.05-0.57). For Alberta, there is a significant and positive interaction for arrhythmia (0.48, CI = 0.12-0.85). These results indicate that there was a statistically significant increase in adverse health outcomes for five of the eighteen disease-province pairings associated with the increase in atmospheric CO after 2011 coinciding with enhanced wildfire emissions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".