Research on the Behavioral Mechanism of Community Conflict in Tourism Development
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Against the backdrop of rapid tourism development, conflicts between community residents and foreign tourism investors and local governments are becoming increasingly prominent. This paper focuses on the conflict behaviours of community residents and based on relative deprivation theory, institutional trust theory, and public service perception theory, constructs a theoretical model that includes variables such as institutional fairness, sense of participation, psychological belonging, and perception of benefit distribution. Residents of a popular tourist destination in East China were collected through a questionnaire survey, and the structural equation modelling (SEM) method was used to empirically test the relevant path relationships. The study found that: (1) relative deprivation has a significant positive impact on conflict behaviour; (2) institutional trust plays a partial mediating role between public service satisfaction and conflict behaviour; (3) improving residents’ sense of participation and psychological belonging can effectively alleviate conflict tendencies; and (4) a fair benefit distribution mechanism and environmental governance performance are also key factors influencing residents’ attitudes. Finally, this paper proposes policy recommendations for enhancing institutional trust, optimizing resource allocation, and strengthening community participation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it