MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414523611 · doi:10.1177/02537176251377494

Morphological Changes of the Retina in Alcohol Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Using Optical Coherence Tomography

2025· review· en· W4414523611 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Psychological Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinaOptical coherence tomographyRetinalAlcohol consumptionAlcoholExcessive alcohol consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose of the Review: Chronic alcohol use is associated with various structural and functional changes in the brain. Retinal morphology assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) non-invasively detects alcohol related damage to the brain and can be a disease marker. Collection and Analysis of Data: A systematic review of studies comparing retinal morphology using OCT, between alcohol use disorder (AUD) patients and healthy controls (HC) from PubMed, Scopus and Embase databases was performed (on 15/April/2025). Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for the thickness of retinal parameters, at both disc and macula: Retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), choroid thickness (CT), macular thickness (MT) and macular volume (MV). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for risk of bias (RoB) assessment. Publication bias, sensitivity analysis and certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using Doi plots, the leave-one-out method and the GRADE approach, respectively. Results: Of the 2,416 records screened, eight studies ( n = AUD = 6,276 eyes; HC = 2,695 eyes) were included in meta-analyses. They revealed significant thinning of the total (pooled SMD = −0.41; 95% CI = −0.68, −0.14; I 2 = 75%; k = 6) and nasal (pooled SMD = −0.36; 95% CI = −0.58, −0.13; I 2 = 56%; k = 6) peripapillary RNFL in AUD patients. Significantly lower average MT (pooled SMD = −0.62; 95% CI = −0.95, −0.29; I 2 = 50%; k = 3) and macular GCIPL thickness (pooled SMD = −0.19; 95% CI = −0.33, −0.06; I 2 = 67%; k = 3) were shown. CoE was ‘moderate’ for total peripapillary RNFL thinning, but was ‘very low’ for other outcomes, owing to heterogeneity and publication bias. RoB assessment showed one study with unsatisfactory quality. Conclusions: Evidence for thinning of retinal layers, especially the peripapillary RNFL, as AUD disease-markers is promising, but preliminary. Our results align with the hypothesis that chronic alcohol consumption induces neurodegenerative changes in the retina and, therefore, the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.219
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it