Leveraging Sparse Autoencoders to Reveal Interpretable Features in Geophysical Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Machine learning is an increasingly popular tool in the geosciences, offering new approaches to numerical weather prediction and complex data set analysis. However, as reliance on these techniques grows, pressing questions about model transparency, internal biases, and trust emerge. Although post hoc explainability analyses can provide insights on how neural network (NN) outputs are generated, a robust framework for interpreting internal decision‐making remains underdeveloped. We address this challenge by exploring a framework to better understand the inner structure of NNs using sparse autoencoders (SAEs). With simplified multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), we demonstrate that hidden layer neurons often exhibit polysemantic behavior where each feature is mapped to a linear combination of neurons, creating an overcomplete representation. This phenomenon, known as superposition, arises when networks encode more features than available neurons, causing neurons to respond to multiple, seemingly unrelated inputs. By introducing a regularized SAE that learns from the original MLP's activations, we can disentangle these representations resulting in a 33% reduction in the average number of sensitive inputs per neuron. Applied to a precipitation classification model, this framework reveals evidence of monosemantic behavior in which neurons respond to a single meaningful concept tied to specific physical phenomena such as temperature and fall speed thresholds for precipitation phase partitioning. We observe similar monosemantic behavior in SAE activations from a snowfall rate regressor related to particle concentration intensity and vertical radar structures. This framework supports the development of more physically consistent interpretations of hidden neuron activations and improved trust in operational ML models across the geosciences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".