MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414733097 · doi:10.1038/s41439-025-00326-y

JG2: an updated version of the Japanese population-specific reference genome

2025· article· en· W4414733097 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Genome Variation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Aging
FundersMoonshot Research and Development ProgramJapan Science and Technology AgencyMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyJapan Agency for Medical Research and Development
KeywordsReference genomeGenomeRepresentativeness heuristicGenomicsResource (disambiguation)Sequence assemblyDNA sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here we present the construction of JG2, an updated population-specific reference genome for the Japanese population. Utilizing data from three individuals previously used in the construction of JG1, several methodologies were employed to enhance genomic coverage and assembly quality. Hi-C sequencing technology facilitated phase-aware assembly, generating two haploid assemblies per individual and enabling improved representation of genetic variation. A meta-assembly strategy and a majority decision approach further refined assembly quality by combining the best sequences from multiple assemblies and minimizing the inclusion of rare variants. The resulting JG2 genome comprises chromosome-level sequences, mitochondrial chromosomes and unplaced scaffolds, offering more comprehensive coverage of the Japanese genome. Comparative analyses with other reference genomes demonstrated the accuracy and representativeness of JG2, highlighting its utility for genetic research involving the Japanese population. Overall, by adopting the phased assembly technique, JG2 represents a substantial advancement over the collapsed assembly-based JG1, with improvements including a greater number of identified variants (3,115,695 variants, of which 298,644 had an allele frequency (AF) of 1.0 in the 3.5KJPNv2 AF panel) and a higher N50 value (152,668,378 bp). These enhancements provide researchers with a more precise and comprehensive resource for understanding the genetic landscape of the Japanese population. The sequences and annotations are available on the jMorp website ( https://jmorp.megabank.tohoku.ac.jp/ ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it