Adversarial Erasing Enhanced Multiple Instance Learning (siMILe): Discriminative Identification of Oligomeric Protein Structures in Single Molecule Localization Microscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) achieves nanoscale imaging of complex protein structures in the cell. However, the ability to capture structural variability across cell conditions (cell lines, gene expression, treatment) from 3D point cloud SMLM data remains limited. We present siMILe, a weakly supervised multiple instance learning machine learning method to close this gap in interpretable subcellular discovery. siMILe identifies condition-specific changes in protein assemblies by leveraging their shape and network features, without requiring structure-level supervision. siMILe improves structure classification by extending embedded instance selection through adversarial erasing and a symmetric classifier. We validated siMILe by detecting caveolae from caveolin-1 (Cav1) labeled PC3 prostate cancer cells differentially expressing cavin-1. In PC3-CAVIN1 cells, cavin-1 closely associates with siMILe-identified caveolae, to a lesser extent with higher-order noncaveolar Cav1 scaffolds, but not small Cav1 oligomers corresponding to 8S complexes, supporting a role for progressive cavin-1 interaction in 8S complex oligomerization. We also validated siMILe on simulated SMLM data and in detecting inhibitor-induced structural variations within clathrin-coated pit data. These results highlight siMILe's potential to identify differential molecular structures in distinct cell conditions. siMILe extends the SuperResNET SMLM software platform with the ability to detect interpretable structural differences across conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".