MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414866891 · doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100419

Sustainable solutions with AHP, reliability, and HAN-fuzzy sensitivity analysis for landfills in Saudi Arabia

2025· article· en· W4414866891 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCleaner Waste Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick
KeywordsSustainabilityStakeholderAnalytic hierarchy processResource (disambiguation)Process (computing)Adaptation (eye)Stakeholder engagementVariable (mathematics)AridPrioritization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Landfills in arid and hot regions pose unique challenges due to accelerated decomposition rates and heightened risks of environmental contamination. This study explores the processes, treatment methods, and design considerations critical for managing waste in such extreme environments. Focusing on Saudi Arabia as a case study, the analysis highlights the need for climate-specific solutions to improve the design and operational efficiency of landfills. To identify key sustainability drivers, a hybrid sensitivity framework combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a Hybrid Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (HAN-Fuzzy) was employed. AHP-derived weights ranged from 0.07 to 0.43, reflecting expert prioritization of variables such as resource reservoir (RR), design, construction & maintenance costs (DS and M&O), and site selection (SS). In contrast, HAN-Fuzzy revealed that RR was the most influential variable (RMSE = 3.29 × 10⁻⁶), followed by DS and M&O (RMSE = 2.20 × 10⁻⁵) and SS (RMSE = 3.28 × 10⁻⁵), illustrating a notable divergence between expert perception and data-driven impact. These findings underscore the importance of aligning strategic planning with both stakeholder input and empirical sensitivity outputs. The study offers actionable insights for policymakers, landfill operators, and environmental engineers seeking to optimize waste management in arid regions. Future directions include incorporating predictive modeling, advanced biodegradation technologies, and stakeholder engagement frameworks, all in alignment with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 goals for sustainable resource use and environmental resilience. • A novel integration of AHP and HAN-Fuzzy models is proposed to assess landfill sustainability in arid and hot climates. • The study identifies Resource Reservoir, DS & M&O costs, and Site Selection as the most sensitive variables influencing landfill performance. • A comprehensive sensitivity analysis was conducted using real data and expert-derived weights across five decision criteria. • Outputs are linked to Saudi Vision 2030 goals, supporting policy on sustainable waste management and circular economy initiatives. • First study to apply HAN-Fuzzy for feature selection and sensitivity analysis in landfill evaluation within the Saudi Arabian context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it