MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414866891 · doi:10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100419

Sustainable solutions with AHP, reliability, and HAN-fuzzy sensitivity analysis for landfills in Saudi Arabia

2025· article· en· W4414866891 on OpenAlexafffund
Saidur Rahman Chowdhury, Zainab H. A. Alnaser, Ikrema Hassan, Sani I. Abba

Bibliographic record

VenueCleaner Waste Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMunicipal Solid Waste Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of New Brunswick
KeywordsSustainabilityStakeholderAnalytic hierarchy processResource (disambiguation)Process (computing)Adaptation (eye)Stakeholder engagementVariable (mathematics)AridPrioritization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Landfills in arid and hot regions pose unique challenges due to accelerated decomposition rates and heightened risks of environmental contamination. This study explores the processes, treatment methods, and design considerations critical for managing waste in such extreme environments. Focusing on Saudi Arabia as a case study, the analysis highlights the need for climate-specific solutions to improve the design and operational efficiency of landfills. To identify key sustainability drivers, a hybrid sensitivity framework combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a Hybrid Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (HAN-Fuzzy) was employed. AHP-derived weights ranged from 0.07 to 0.43, reflecting expert prioritization of variables such as resource reservoir (RR), design, construction & maintenance costs (DS and M&O), and site selection (SS). In contrast, HAN-Fuzzy revealed that RR was the most influential variable (RMSE = 3.29 × 10⁻⁶), followed by DS and M&O (RMSE = 2.20 × 10⁻⁵) and SS (RMSE = 3.28 × 10⁻⁵), illustrating a notable divergence between expert perception and data-driven impact. These findings underscore the importance of aligning strategic planning with both stakeholder input and empirical sensitivity outputs. The study offers actionable insights for policymakers, landfill operators, and environmental engineers seeking to optimize waste management in arid regions. Future directions include incorporating predictive modeling, advanced biodegradation technologies, and stakeholder engagement frameworks, all in alignment with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 goals for sustainable resource use and environmental resilience. • A novel integration of AHP and HAN-Fuzzy models is proposed to assess landfill sustainability in arid and hot climates. • The study identifies Resource Reservoir, DS & M&O costs, and Site Selection as the most sensitive variables influencing landfill performance. • A comprehensive sensitivity analysis was conducted using real data and expert-derived weights across five decision criteria. • Outputs are linked to Saudi Vision 2030 goals, supporting policy on sustainable waste management and circular economy initiatives. • First study to apply HAN-Fuzzy for feature selection and sensitivity analysis in landfill evaluation within the Saudi Arabian context.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCleaner Waste SystemsSame topicMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementFrench-language works237,207