MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414882172 · doi:10.1111/jfpe.70221

Advances in Soft Sensors for Smart Food Drying: Innovations, Challenges, and Industrial Perspectives

2025· article· en· W4414882172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Process Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Soft sensorKey (lock)Quality (philosophy)Product (mathematics)Process (computing)Process controlFood products

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Efficient real‐time monitoring of directly unmeasurable variables, such as product moisture content and quality attributes, is crucial for optimizing process control in smart dryers. Advanced soft sensing techniques, which integrate analytical hardware with mathematical models, have enabled the development of intelligent drying systems. This review comprehensively evaluates applications of soft sensors for online monitoring in food drying, emphasizing performance characteristics such as accuracy, response time, and robustness for real‐time control. Key obstacles, including data contamination, model selection, and adaptability, are examined, and emerging solutions like adaptive algorithms and hybrid modeling strategies are discussed. The review highlights how soft sensors contribute to improved drying efficiency, energy savings, and product quality retention. Broader implications for related industries are also considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it