MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414908411 · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3618763

Breaking Information Granularity Heterogeneity: A Mutual Information-Inspired Causal Discovery Framework for Multi-Rate Time Series

2025· article· en· W4414908411 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGranularitySampling (signal processing)Key (lock)Time seriesMutual informationSeries (stratigraphy)EncoderInformation theory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Causal discovery in multi-rate time series encounters greater challenges compared to regular time series. This stems from a potential problem that has not been noticed and explored in existing studies: <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">information granularity heterogeneity</b>, which refers to the natural difference in information granularity between fast sampling rate data (high information granularity) and slow sampling rate data (low information granularity). Such an imbalance in information granularity can hinder forecasting relationships modeling and induce biased causal learning. Therefore, we propose a <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">M</b>utual Information-i<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">N</b>spired causal <bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">D</b>iscovery framework (<bold xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">MIND</b>), aiming to derive rate-agnostic features with consistent information granularity to alleviate information granularity heterogeneity problem. Technically, MIND comprises Stage 1 (pre-training) and Stage 2 (fine-tuning and causal discovery). In Stage 1, empowered by pseudo-slow sampling rate data (generated through the interleaved down sampling strategy) and mutual information, we can eliminate the influence of sampling rates and drive rate-aware encoders (RAEs) to sense key information (i.e., rate-agnostic) that remains unchanged across varying sampling rates. In Stage 2, the well-trained RAEs can extract rate-agnostic features from real multi-rate time series, thus facilitating effective forecasting relationships modeling and yield accurate causal discovery. Empirically, MIND realizes superior performance on various multi-rate scenarios, including four simulation datasets and one real-world dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.008
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it