MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparative Machine Learning Framework for Rainfall Forecasting and Agricultural Loss Estimation

2025· article· en· W4414956415 on OpenAlexaff
Hasan Ahamed Alif, Md. Jisan Mashrafi, Muhammad Jasim Uddin, Javed Ahmed, Fahim Faiyaz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarning systemEstimationClimate changeRandom forestAgricultureLivelihoodResilience (materials science)Food security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because of the growing unpredictability of the weather, which can affect food security and productivity, the consequences of climate change are no longer speculative; every farmer in South Asia is starting to suffer the ramifications in their fields. In the two most susceptible districts of Bangladesh, Rajshahi and Ishwardi, the comparative machine learning method presented in this study aims to predict rainfall and identify regions at risk of agricultural impacts due to climate change. We examine the performance of four models: the Prophet model, ARIMA, Random Forest, and XGBoost, using 48 years of historical rainfall data (1976–2024). With an R-squared value of 0.89, Random Forest displayed the best accuracy, exceeding both standard time series and boosting-based approaches while efficiently capturing non-seasonal trends. On the other hand, XGBoost performed poorly, possibly due to the difficulty in fitting noisy, small-scale meteorological data. To classify years as droughts or floods, we apply a conventional anomaly detection technique that utilizes z-scores (1.5 standard deviations) in conjunction with predictive modeling. It is feasible to identify problematic years and regions by using these characteristics, which are linked to historical periods of agricultural displacement. The findings are more accessible and helpful when simplified visual maps of climate-induced risk validate the relationship between the projected anomalies and previous crop failures. The suggested method would provide a scientifically informed tool for climate resilience planning, agricultural planning, and early warning systems. The objective of preserving vulnerable livelihoods during a climate transition is achieved by integrating the three aspects of this architecture, namely translating the long-term records of the meteorological system into risk information that agronomists, policymakers, and humanitarian actors can utilize.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207