MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4414995520 · doi:10.1177/15248399251370369

Assessing Situational Awareness for Healthful Behaviors and the “Self-Care Gap” Among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Men With Chronic Conditions

2025· article· en· W4414995520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Promotion Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituational ethicsSocial supportDepression (economics)DiseaseRegression analysisHealth equityPreventive careHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ObjectiveThis study sought to identify factors associated with (1) situational awareness (i.e., daily recognition of situations to make choices to act in the best interest of one's health) and (2) the self-care gap (i.e., not acting in one's best interest despite having recognized at least one opportunity to perform healthful behaviors).MethodsData from 1,761 non-Hispanic Black (58.4%) and Hispanic (41.6%) men aged 40 years or older with chronic conditions were collected using an internet-delivered questionnaire. Two linear regression models were fitted to assess factors associated with situational awareness and the self-care gap, respectively. Regression models were adjusted for sociodemographics, disease symptomatology, preventive screening activity, health behaviors, and health-related perceptions.ResultsSituational awareness levels were lower for older individuals (B = -.03, p < .001). Men who had higher fatigue (B = .11, p = .002), more stress (B = .07, p = .032), utilized more prevention screenings (B = .13, p = .001), adhered to physical activity guidelines (B = .36, p = .044), and received more social support (B = .89, p < .001) reported higher situational awareness. The self-care gap was more pronounced among non-Hispanic Black men (B = -.32, p = .026). Men who reported higher fatigue (B = .06, p = .041), clinical depression (B = .39, p = .039), more barriers to self-care (B = .11, p < .001), and higher frustrations with health care (B = .12, p < .001) were associated with greater self-care gaps.ConclusionsMen's recognition of healthful opportunities was largely driven by their disease symptomatology, greater engagement in preventive screenings, and receiving social support. However, the self-care gap was seemingly driven by mental health and challenges with disease self-management and health care interactions. Efforts are needed to narrow disparities in the self-care gap between non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it