Advancing long-term precipitation pattern forecasting in Atlantic Canada using successive variational mode decomposition, recursive LSTM, and graph-based feature selection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Precipitation forecasting is crucial in Canada's Maritime provinces, given their unique geography and susceptibility to precipitation impacts. Accurate forecasts aid farmers, transportation authorities, and climate change adaptation efforts, ecosystems, and infrastructure. This study introduces a groundbreaking multi-temporal deep-learning framework for forecasting monthly precipitation in Canada's Maritime region, encompassing Charlottetown and St. John's, distinguishing it as a trailblazing innovation among cutting-edge complementary deep-learning algorithms. This pioneering research unveils, for the first time, a cutting-edge hybrid framework that synergizes successive variational mode decomposition (SVMD), recursive long short-term memory (RLSTM), graph feature selection, and Borda count-based multi-criteria decision-making (BORDA). The innovative aspect lies in the recursive architecture of RLSTM, which sets it apart from traditional SVMD-LSTM hybrids by enabling multi-horizon memory feedback loops that improve long-range temporal learning. Integrating graph-based feature selection with partial autocorrelation function (PACF) analysis enhances the extraction of the most informative SVMD components, enhancing prediction accuracy and reducing model complexity. Furthermore, the framework is distinguished by its precise and efficient performance, facilitated by intuitive hyperparameter configurations during both the decomposition and training stages. It provides a pragmatic and scalable alternative to other leading complementary deep-learning methods. To benchmark the performance of the primary model, it is compared against a convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM), random vector functional link (RVFL), and a light gradient-boosting machine (LightGBM), with a rigorous evaluation of both standalone and hybrid counterparts. To assess the accuracy of the model, a single metric comprising six statistical indices, including correlation coefficient (R), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), consolidated via BORDA, was employed to simplify the identification of superior frameworks. An accuracy assessment in Charlottetown reveals that SVMD–RLSTM, owing to optimal metrics (BORDA 0.95, R = 0.9508, and RMSE = 15.6567 mm|T + 1; BORDA = 0.7834, R = 0.9297, and RMSE = 18.7170; |T + 3, BORDA = 0.6855, R = 0.906, and RMSE = 21.3539|T + 7), outperformed SVMD–RVFL (BORDA|T + 1 = 0.927 and BORDA), SVMD-CNN-LSTM (BORDA|T + 1 = 0.8037), and SVMD-LightGBM (BORDA|T + 1 = 0.713); whereas a diagnostic assessment in St. John's station confirms the superiority of SVMD–RLSTM (BORDA = 0.9171, R = 0.9337, and RMSE = 19.0093 mm|T + 1; BORDA = 0.5951, R = 0.9251, and RMSE = 23.6887; |T + 3, BORDA = 0.6898, R = 0.9157, and RMSE = 21.3299 mm|T + 7) over the other hybrid frameworks. • A new SVMD-RLSTM model improves precipitation forecasting in Atlantic Canada • Graph feature selection enhances prediction by finding key rainfall patterns • Hybrid model surpasses CNN-LSTM and RVFL in multi-temporal forecasting • Easy-to-tune parameters for both decomposition and training phases • First use of SVMD for Maritime precipitation forecast yields superior results
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it