The aesthetic labour of polycystic ovarian syndrome: The strife of heteronormative standards and the possibilities of queering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article contributes to the burgeoning qualitative literature on experiences of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome (PCOS) by considering PCOS in relation to post-structural theory on gender, sexuality, embodiment, and aesthetic labour. Although to some degree culturally contingent, interview accounts with 30 people diagnosed with PCOS suggest that infertility, hairiness, acne, and/or fatness are a difficult combination with heterosexuality and a source of stigma regardless of identity. This article outlines the aesthetic labour women engaged in to meet heterosexual standards, highlighting structure, and where possible, agency in this work. It also highlights the potential of queer relationships, communities, and perspectives to disrupt heteronormative pressures, considering the promise and limits of bodily acceptance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it