MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Research on Intelligent Control and Optimization Strategies for Household Electricity Usage

2025· article· en· W4415166551 on OpenAlexaff
Yitong Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Computational Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsEarl Haig Secondary School
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityConsumption (sociology)Energy consumptionEnergy conservationElectricity generationControl (management)Mains electricityPower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research has shown that the household electricity consumption in each country often occupies the largest amount of electricity consumption in the country. This problem has been exacerbated by the increasing prevalence of electric vehicles, leading to a continuous rise in power consumption. Addressing this issue is crucial for achieving substantial energy savings. The research focuses on analyzing electricity consumption patterns in both office and residential areas. The primary method employed involves utilizing mobile devices to collect and examine relevant data. The findings reveal that household electricity consumption is indeed substantial, regardless of the number of family members or the age composition within a household. Based on these findings, the study proposes effective strategies to reduce residential electricity consumption. These strategies are designed to be practical and applicable, offering potential solutions to this pressing issue. The research concludes that with proper implementation, significant reductions in household electricity consumption can be achieved, contributing to overall energy conservation efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Computational EngineeringSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207