MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Research on Intelligent Control and Optimization Strategies for Household Electricity Usage

2025· article· en· W4415166551 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Computational Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsEarl Haig Secondary School
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricityConsumption (sociology)Energy consumptionEnergy conservationElectricity generationControl (management)Mains electricityPower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research has shown that the household electricity consumption in each country often occupies the largest amount of electricity consumption in the country. This problem has been exacerbated by the increasing prevalence of electric vehicles, leading to a continuous rise in power consumption. Addressing this issue is crucial for achieving substantial energy savings. The research focuses on analyzing electricity consumption patterns in both office and residential areas. The primary method employed involves utilizing mobile devices to collect and examine relevant data. The findings reveal that household electricity consumption is indeed substantial, regardless of the number of family members or the age composition within a household. Based on these findings, the study proposes effective strategies to reduce residential electricity consumption. These strategies are designed to be practical and applicable, offering potential solutions to this pressing issue. The research concludes that with proper implementation, significant reductions in household electricity consumption can be achieved, contributing to overall energy conservation efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it