Lightweight Adaptation of Large Language and Vision Models in Robotics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of large-scale multimodal foundation models, combining state-of-the-art language and vision representations, has ushered in unprecedented capabilities for perception, reasoning, and decision-making in complex environments. These models, commonly referred to as multimodal large language and vision models (LLVMs), are pretrained on massive heterogeneous datasets and demonstrate remarkable generalization across a variety of downstream tasks. However, their sheer scale-often encompassing billions of parameters-poses formidable challenges for deployment in resource-constrained and real-time systems, such as autonomous robots, where memory, computational throughput, and energy budgets are tightly limited. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm to address this bottleneck, enabling task-specific adaptation by modifying only a small subset of model parameters, or by introducing compact auxiliary modules, while leaving the majority of the pretrained weights frozen. By doing so, PEFT maintains the extensive knowledge encoded in the foundational model while drastically reducing both computational and storage overheads, facilitating rapid adaptation to new robotic tasks, environments, and user instructions. This review provides a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art PEFT methodologies, including low-rank adaptation (LoRA), adapter modules, prompt tuning, prefix tuning, and hybrid approaches, with a focus on their application to multimodal LLVMs in robotics. We explore the mathematical underpinnings of these techniques, formalizing their parameter constraints, forward-pass computations, and optimization strategies, and we illustrate their integration into robotic perceptionto-action pipelines using schematics and comparative tables. Special emphasis is placed on applications across vision-language navigation, robotic manipulation, and human-robot interaction, highlighting how PEFT facilitates few-shot learning, continual adaptation, and multi-modal reasoning without the need for full-model retraining. Furthermore, we discuss critical challenges, including distributional shifts between pretraining and operational domains, real-time inference constraints, interpretability, safety, and verification, while outlining promising future directions such as hierarchical modular adaptation, online learning, and embodied pretraining to bridge these gaps. Overall, PEFT provides a principled and practical framework for harnessing the immense capabilities of multimodal LLVMs in robotics, enabling autonomous systems that are adaptable, efficient, and capable of integrating complex multimodal knowledge into actionable, real-world behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".