MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415224701 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.08.197

Design of an Autonomic Software System for Dragonfly’s Wind Tunnel

2025· article· en· W4415224701 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersApplied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins UniversityAlberta Precision LaboratoriesLangley Research CenterNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Wind tunnelInstrumentation (computer programming)Variety (cybernetics)Control systemSoftwareSystems designControl (management)Atmosphere (unit)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Dragonfly mission – designed to explore Titan, Saturn’s largest moon – demands cutting-edge control and instrumentation systems to navigate the dense atmosphere and varied terrain, characterized by low gravity, extreme cold, and diverse surface features. At the core of this effort is the development of a highly-adaptive wind tunnel system, meticulously engineered to meet evolving performance testing requirements while generating high-fidelity data crucial for rotorcraft design. These data support the development and validation of advanced exploratory guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) algorithms and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, enabling Dragonfly to perform autonomous flight and scientific exploration in an uncharted extraterrestrial environment. To achieve these ambitious goals, the wind tunnel system leverages principles of autonomic computing, integrating self-monitoring, self-configuring, and self-optimizing capabilities to enhance its adaptability. These autonomic features ensure that the system can dynamically adjust to varying test conditions, such as integrating and instrumenting a variety of sensor types with unique signal conditioning needs, seamless switching between different communication protocols, and adjustments to rotorcraft configurations, without the need for constant human intervention or a complete system rearchitecture. Furthermore, the application of adaptable system design principles not only facilitates the creation of this unprecedented testing infrastructure but also ensures its flexibility to accommodate future refinements and mission-specific requirements. This paper details how these design principles are applied, enabling the successful implementation of a highly innovative and versatile system that aligns with the evolving needs of the Dragonfly mission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it