SemiSeg-CAW: Semi-Supervised Segmentation of Ultrasound Images by Leveraging Class-Level Information and an Adaptive Multi-Loss Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The limited availability of pixel-level annotated medical images complicates training supervised segmentation models, as these models require large datasets. To deal with this issue, SemiSeg-CAW, a semi-supervised segmentation framework that leverages class-level information and an adaptive multi-loss function, is proposed to reduce dependency on extensive annotations. The model combines segmentation and classification tasks in a multitask architecture that includes segmentation, classification, weight generation, and ClassElevateSeg modules. In this framework, the ClassElevateSeg module is initially pre-trained and then fine-tuned jointly with the main model to produce auxiliary feature maps that support the main model, while the adaptive weighting strategy computes a dynamic combination of classification and segmentation losses using trainable weights. The proposed approach enables effective use of both labeled and unlabeled images with class-level information by compensating for the shortage of pixel-level labels. Experimental evaluation on two public ultrasound datasets demonstrates that SemiSeg-CAW consistently outperforms fully supervised segmentation models when trained with equal or fewer labeled samples. The results suggest that incorporating class-level information with adaptive loss weighting provides an effective strategy for semi-supervised medical image segmentation and can improve the segmentation performance in situations with limited annotations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".