MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415382450 · doi:10.1145/3772082

MAD-HiSpMV: Matrix Adaptive Design with Hybrid Row Distribution for Imbalanced SpMV Acceleration on FPGAs

2025· article· en· W4415382450 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeedupKernel (algebra)Multiplication (music)Benchmark (surveying)Matrix multiplicationBottleneckCUDASparse matrixPerformance improvement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparse Matrix–Vector Multiplication (SpMV) is fundamental in numerous applications such as scientific computing, Machine Learning (ML), and graph analytics. While recent studies have made tremendous progress in accelerating SpMV on HBM-equipped FPGAs, there are still multiple remaining challenges to accelerate imbalanced SpMV where the distribution of nonzeros in the sparse matrix is imbalanced across different rows. These include (1) imbalanced workload distribution among the parallel Processing Elements (PEs), (2) long-distance dependency for floating-point accumulation on the output vector, (3) a new bottleneck due to the often-overlooked dense vectors’ off-chip access after the SpMV acceleration, and (4) sub-optimal performance of generic accelerators for various types of sparse matrices. (5) Additionally, ML workloads often consist of both SpMV and General Matrix–Vector Multiplication (GeMV), which suffer from kernel switching inefficiencies. To address those challenges, we propose MAD-HiSpMV to accelerate imbalanced SpMV on HBM-equipped FPGAs with the following novel solutions: (1) a hybrid row distribution network to enable both inter-row and intra-row distribution for better balance, (2) a fully pipelined floating-point accumulation on the output vector using a combination of an adder chain and register-based circular buffer, (3) matrix adaptive design configurations generated by our automation framework via Design Space Exploration (DSE) to maximize performance for the given matrix, and (4) a GeMV overlay built into the same kernel for efficient acceleration of mixed workloads. Experimental results demonstrate that the DSE-picked configuration of MAD-HiSpMV achieves a geomean speedup of 1.3× (up to 2.12×) for the SpMV benchmark matrices and achieves a geomean 1.15× (up to 1.54×) better performance per watt, when compared to state-of-the-art generic designs. For the SpMV benchmark matrices, compared to Intel MKL running on a 24-core Xeon Silver 4214 CPU, MAD-HiSpMV achieves a geomean speedup of 8.80×. Compared to cuSparse running on an Nvidia GTX 1080ti GPU, MAD-HiSpMV achieves a geomean of 2.57× better performance per watt. Additionally, a GeMV overlay built into MAD-HiSpMV achieves a peak throughput of 156.7 GFLOPS, which is 2.64× better than the Vitis L2 GeMV benchmark on U280, and performs 2.7× better for an end-to-end mixed workload, when compared to Intel MKL running on a 24-core Xeon Silver 4214 CPU. MAD-HiSpMV is available at https://github.com/SFU-HiAccel/HiSpMV .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it