MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415438695 · doi:10.1080/10428232.2025.2573599

Rethinking Intergenerational Trauma: Exploring How Forced Central American Migrants and Their Children Understand and Are Shaped by the Aftereffects of Violence

2025· article· en· W4415438695 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Progressive Human Services · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityMount Allison UniversityUniversity of TorontoYork University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsImmigrationDomestic violenceStructural violencePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the coloniality lens and a community-based approach, this project examined the oral histories of twenty-one people of Salvadorian, Guatemalan, Honduran, and Nicaraguan backgrounds who were born in Canada or arrived at a young age. The authors examined how present-day interpretations of violent experiences shaped family relationships and the sense of self. The findings show how participants relied on Eurocentric ideas of “trauma” to understand violence’s aftereffects. This resulted in their individualization, psychologization, and pathologization of their own and others’ struggles. The discussion encouraged decolonial community organizing to explore non-Western ways of healing from the aftereffects of violence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it