Multi‐Step Forecasting of U.S. Maritime Transportation Flows Using Hybrid ARIMA, PCR, CNN, and Recurrent Neural Network Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maritime transportation plays an essential role in the global economy, supporting trade, supply chains and the development of countries. Forecasting maritime traffic and shipping connectivity between different ports in the United States can help us optimize trading strategy, improve global economic competition and promote technological innovation,. In this paper, six time series forecasting models, ARIMA, PCR, GRU, CNN, RNN and LSTM, are used to forecast the mode of maritime transportation trade in United State and compare between each model to discuss which fits well and further apply to future three years. This approach enables a comparative analysis of the relationship between port performance and geographic time-zone divisions. Applying data from The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) to the models demonstrates that the most suitable model of the data is PCR. With accurate forecasts, policymakers and stakeholders could formulate forward-looking strategies for risk mitigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it