MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415447705 · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.109127

A deep learning model leveraging semantic features fusion for DNase I hypersensitive sites identification in the human genome

2025· article· en· W4415447705 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersKing Faisal UniversityDeanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Deep learningCode (set theory)Identification (biology)Feature learningSource codeRepresentation (politics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Semantic feature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs) are chromatin regions that are extremely sensitive to the DNase I enzyme, increasing their accessibility for cellular processes. DHSs are crucial for understanding transcriptional regulation mechanisms and contain genetic variations linked to various diseases such as breast cancer, coronary artery disease, Alzheimer's disease, autoimmune disorders, and neurological conditions. However, conventional DHSs identification methods are labor-intensive and resource-heavy, necessitating the need for alternative cost-effective approaches with high performance. METHODS: In this study, we propose various computational models, namely the CNN model, the CNN-GRU fusion model, the CNN-kmer fusion model, and the CNN-GRU-kmer fusion model, to overcome the challenges associated with DHSs prediction. The CNN Model is based on a simple 1-dimensional convocational neural network (CNN). The CNN-GRU fusion model is based on a simple 1-dimensional CNN and gated recurrent unit (GRU) and then fuses the feature maps of CNN and GRU. The CNN-kmer fusion model is based on a simple 1-dimensional CNN and k-mer features. First, we input the k-mer features to a dense layer; the output of the dense layer is fused with CNN features. In the CNN-GRU-kmer fusion model, based on simple 1-dimensional CNN, GRU, and k-mer features, first we input the k-mer features to a dense layer; the output of the dense layer is fused with CNN features and GRU features and fed to a dense layer with a sigmoid function for prediction. RESULTS: The proposed models were validated in the publicly available dataset, obtaining an accuracy of 0.8631, a sensitivity of 0.7209, a specificity of 0.9353, an MCC of 0.6468, an AUC ROC of 0.8528, and an AUC PR of 0.7530. These results surpass all performance evaluation metrics of state-of-the-art models. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents that the model integrates semantic vector-based feature fusion representation, which effectively captures both local and global patterns with inherited spatio-temporal dependencies within complex DHSs sequences. The model's performance was validated both with and without semantic feature fusion, followed by quantitative and statistical analyses against individual models, significantly enhancing feature representation and classification performance. Source code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/malikmtahir/DNase/tree/main.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it