MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415447705 · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.109127

A deep learning model leveraging semantic features fusion for DNase I hypersensitive sites identification in the human genome

2025· article· en· W4415447705 on OpenAlexaff
Fawaz Khaled Alarfaj, Muhammad Tahir, Gautam Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersKing Faisal UniversityDeanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Deep learningCode (set theory)Identification (biology)Feature learningSource codeRepresentation (politics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Semantic feature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs) are chromatin regions that are extremely sensitive to the DNase I enzyme, increasing their accessibility for cellular processes. DHSs are crucial for understanding transcriptional regulation mechanisms and contain genetic variations linked to various diseases such as breast cancer, coronary artery disease, Alzheimer's disease, autoimmune disorders, and neurological conditions. However, conventional DHSs identification methods are labor-intensive and resource-heavy, necessitating the need for alternative cost-effective approaches with high performance. METHODS: In this study, we propose various computational models, namely the CNN model, the CNN-GRU fusion model, the CNN-kmer fusion model, and the CNN-GRU-kmer fusion model, to overcome the challenges associated with DHSs prediction. The CNN Model is based on a simple 1-dimensional convocational neural network (CNN). The CNN-GRU fusion model is based on a simple 1-dimensional CNN and gated recurrent unit (GRU) and then fuses the feature maps of CNN and GRU. The CNN-kmer fusion model is based on a simple 1-dimensional CNN and k-mer features. First, we input the k-mer features to a dense layer; the output of the dense layer is fused with CNN features. In the CNN-GRU-kmer fusion model, based on simple 1-dimensional CNN, GRU, and k-mer features, first we input the k-mer features to a dense layer; the output of the dense layer is fused with CNN features and GRU features and fed to a dense layer with a sigmoid function for prediction. RESULTS: The proposed models were validated in the publicly available dataset, obtaining an accuracy of 0.8631, a sensitivity of 0.7209, a specificity of 0.9353, an MCC of 0.6468, an AUC ROC of 0.8528, and an AUC PR of 0.7530. These results surpass all performance evaluation metrics of state-of-the-art models. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents that the model integrates semantic vector-based feature fusion representation, which effectively captures both local and global patterns with inherited spatio-temporal dependencies within complex DHSs sequences. The model's performance was validated both with and without semantic feature fusion, followed by quantitative and statistical analyses against individual models, significantly enhancing feature representation and classification performance. Source code and datasets are available at: https://github.com/malikmtahir/DNase/tree/main.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Methods and Programs in BiomedicineSame topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207