Artful Minds, Healing, and Well-Being: Women, Art, Science, and Technology in Latin America, 1970s to the Present
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Conceived as part of a broader recovery of histories of Latin American women working with science and technology, “Artful Minds, Healing and Well-Being: Women, Art, Science, and Technology in Latin America 1970s to the Present” includes a selection of projects that share Leonardo’s focus on topics related to health. Ten artists from five Latin American countries (Mexico, Brazil, Colombia, Argentina, and Chile) represent a sampling of relevant practitioners. The works span fifty years, from the 1970s to the present, and involve various fields and technologies, from sonic, video, computational, and AI arts, to medical technologies and bioart, to technologically aided installations and performances. Created in various formats as solo-authored, collaborative, and participatory works, these projects include diverse physical and virtual environments, from artistic, domestic, scientific, and electronic spaces to urban and rural areas in Latin America and Europe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it