MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415542041 · doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100298

Relaxation-compensated chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI in the cervical spinal cord at 3T: An application in multiple sclerosis

2025· article· en· W4415542041 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroimage Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringVanderbilt UniversitySociety for Anthropological SciencesNational Institutes of HealthNational Multiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisSpinal cordMagnetization transferCentral nervous systemMagnetic resonance imagingCentral nervous system diseaseRelaxometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system, characterized by demyelination. Exploring pathological changes in the spinal cord could improve our understanding of the mechanisms that cause neurological dysfunction and clinical symptoms; however, conventional MRI is not sensitive to molecular changes within the tissue. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) can probe tissue biochemistry with high resolution and sensitivity, without exogenous contrasts. However, CEST measurements in vivo are contaminated by concurrent effects including semi-solid magnetization transfer (MT), direct water saturation, and T1-relaxation, which can be altered in MS and need to be removed to accurately quantify changes. Fifty-three people with relapsing-remitting MS (pwRRMS) and 45 healthy controls (HCs) were imaged at 3 T to quantify amide and nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) CEST effects in the cervical spinal cord. Using Lorentzian fitting, confounding effects were removed, and the apparent exchange-dependent relaxation (AREX) contrast was calculated. Uncorrected and corrected AREX amide and NOE contrasts were compared across groups and tissue types. In pwRRMS, AREX NOE was significantly different in lesions compared to normal-appearing white matter. Greater heterogeneity in both CEST contrasts was observed in pwRRMS compared to the HCs. In a sub-analysis of pwRRMS separated by neurological disability, AREX amide was significantly different between pwRRMS with and without disability. The correction of confounding factors in this study highlights the importance of isolating CEST effects in the cervical spinal cord for more specific characterization and to better understand changes in tissue pathology and relationship to disease severity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it