MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415692889 · doi:10.1186/s12862-025-02446-z

Predicting habitat suitability of Dalbergia latifolia Roxb. (Indian rosewood) using MaxEnt: implications for conservation and sustainable forest management

2025· article· en· W4415692889 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T. N. Manohara, S. Vazeed Pasha, B. Swarada, SM Balakrishna

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Ecology and Evolution · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Council of Forestry Research and EducationTerry Fox Research Institute
KeywordsIUCN Red ListThreatened speciesOverexploitationHabitatNear-threatened speciesSubtropicsHabitat destructionForest managementTropics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Dalbergia latifolia Roxb. (Indian rosewood) is a leguminous tropical hardwood of high ecological and economic value, native to India’s tropical and subtropical forests. Its richly coloured, durable heartwood and acoustic qualities make it a prized timber in domestic and international markets. Ecologically, the species contributes to forest health by stabilising soils, fixing atmospheric nitrogen, and supporting associated biodiversity. However, populations have sharply declined due to illegal logging, unsustainable harvesting, and habitat loss. It is currently classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List (2020, Criteria A1cd), Near Threatened in India (IUCN, 2018), and has been listed in CITES Appendix II since 2016. India remains the largest global supplier, with Karnataka contributing over 50% of national output. Yet, less than 1% of its standing stock is under managed cultivation due to slow growth, long rotations, and restrictive harvest policies. While initiatives such as CAMPA and the National Agroforestry Policy have encouraged enrichment planting, efforts remain fragmented and lack spatially explicit data for prioritisation. RESULTS: Using Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) modelling with high-resolution climate data, we generated the first range-wide habitat suitability maps for D. latifolia in India. The model showed high predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.912), identifying tropical dry and moist deciduous zones as primary habitats. High-suitability areas were concentrated in the southern Western Ghats, especially Karnataka, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu, with additional patches in Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh. Among 19 bioclimatic variables, annual mean temperature, temperature seasonality, and precipitation of the driest quarter were most influential. Accuracy improved through spatial filtering and validation of occurrence records. Despite broad climatically suitable areas, only 17.2% overlapped with existing Protected Areas, revealing major conservation gaps. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides the first high-resolution, range-wide habitat suitability assessment for Dalbergia latifolia in India. The findings offer a scientific basis for conservation prioritisation, in-situ restoration, ex-situ conservation, and ecologically informed plantation design. The results are directly relevant to national initiatives such as CAMPA and the CAMPA-funded AICRP-28 on D. latifolia, where spatially explicit data can guide resource allocation, site prioritisation, and restoration planning. Beyond rosewood, the MaxEnt framework demonstrated here can be applied to other threatened or commercially important tropical tree species. Future modelling that integrates land-use change and high-resolution climate projections will further strengthen adaptive management and ensure the long-term conservation of climate-sensitive species under changing environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Ecology and EvolutionSame topicSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeFrench-language works237,207