MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415707388 · doi:10.1109/jproc.2025.3623023

Field-Programmable Gate Array Architecture for Deep Learning: Survey and Future Directions

2025· article· W4415707388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the IEEE · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayInterfacingDataflowVariety (cybernetics)ArchitectureDataflow architectureReconfigurable computingData processingGraphicsEmulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep learning (DL) is becoming the cornerstone of numerous applications both in large-scale datacenters and at the edge. Specialized hardware is often necessary to meet the performance requirements of state-of-the-art DL models, but the rapid pace of change in DL models and the wide variety of systems integrating DL make it impossible to create custom computer chips for all but the largest markets. Field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) present a unique blend of reprogrammability and direct hardware execution that make them suitable for accelerating DL inference. They offer the ability to customize processing pipelines and memory hierarchies to achieve lower latency and higher energy efficiency compared to general-purpose central processing units (CPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs), at a fraction of the development time and cost of custom chips. Their diverse and high-speed inputs/outputs (IOs) also enable directly interfacing the FPGA to the network and/or a variety of external sensors, making them suitable for both datacenter and edge use cases. As DL has become an ever more important workload, FPGA architectures are evolving to enable higher DL performance. In this article, we survey both academic and industrial <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">FPGA chip architecture</i> enhancements for DL. First, we give a brief introduction on the basics of FPGA architecture and how its components lead to strengths and weaknesses for DL applications. Next, we discuss different <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">design styles</i> of DL inference accelerators implemented on FPGAs that achieve state-of-the-art performance and productive development flows, ranging from model-specific dataflow styles to software-programmable overlay styles. We survey DL-specific enhancements to traditional FPGA building blocks including the logic blocks (LBs), arithmetic circuitry, and on-chip memories, as well as new DL-specialized blocks that integrate into the FPGA fabric to accelerate tensor computations. Finally, we discuss hybrid devices that combine processors and coarse-grained accelerator blocks with FPGA-like interconnect and networks-on-chip (NoCs), and highlight promising future research directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it