MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415717750 · doi:10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101262

Efficacy of 4 % deltamethrin-impregnated collars against canine visceral leishmaniasis across different areas and the sociocultural burden of collar loss in a middle-income country

2025· article· en· W4415717750 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOne Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersKey Laboratory of Synthetic Rubber, Chinese Academy of SciencesFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsCollarVisceral leishmaniasisOddsDiseaseCervical collarPublic healthOdds ratio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite efforts to control visceral leishmaniasis (VL), the disease remains a major burden in low- and middle-income countries. In South America, insecticide-impregnated dog collars help prevent disease transmission, as dogs are the main reservoirs in urban areas. This study evaluated the efficacy of 4 % deltamethrin-impregnated collars (DMC) against canine VL (CVL) over a 24-month period in an endemic area of Brazil. We compared 941 DMC dogs with 1032 control dogs (C) across four geographic areas with similar baseline disease prevalence. The difference between the DMC and C cohorts was statistically significant ( p < 0.05), and the study achieved an overall efficacy of 63 %, 51 %, 48 %, and 58 % at the first, second, third, and fourth follow-ups, respectively. Among dogs that remained protected, efficacy was 74 %, 67 %, 100 %, and 100 % across the follow-ups, whereas in dogs that lost their collars between follow-ups, efficacy was 45 %, 10 %, 23 %, and − 11 %. Collar loss between follow-ups was associated with a 2.25-fold increase in the odds of CVL (OR 2.25, p < 0.05). No statistically significant geographical variation in collar loss was observed, and most losses were potentially preventable. However, infrequently bathed dogs had significantly higher odds of CVL (OR 9.93, p < 0.05). These results help demystify sociocultural stigmas related to collar loss and support the development of targeted public health education initiatives. Ensuring collar retention, incorporating owners' cultural behaviors to promote consistent collar use, and integrating educational actions within the One Health and Health Promotion frameworks are crucial to maximizing the success of large-scale dog interventions in public health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it