MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MODERN TRENDS IN MOTORIZATION AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

2025· article· W4415814966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCollected scientific works of Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation Systems and Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrificationTaxisPublic transportContext (archaeology)Sustainable transportKey (lock)Smart cityTraffic congestionSustainable developmentIntelligent transportation system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the 21st century, global transport systems are undergoing a profound transformation driven by environmental challenges and technological advancements. Sustainable transport has emerged as a key development vector, involving not only the gradual elimination of internal combustion engines but also a redefinition of mobility principles.A central trend is the electrification of transport. Major automakers have announced plans to phase out petrol-powered vehicles, while charging infrastructure is rapidly expanding across Europe, North America, and China, enhancing the everyday practicality of electric vehicles.Digitalization is another crucial direction. Cities are adopting intelligent traffic management systems – adaptive traffic signals, real-time congestion monitoring, and smart parking solutions. Urban mobility control centers in cities such as Singapore, Barcelona, and Tokyo use AI and machine learning to streamline traffic flows, reduce emissions, and improve travel efficiency.The «Mobility as a Service» model is also gaining momentum. It offers users access to various transport modes – public transit, bike-sharing, car-sharing, and taxis – via a single platform or app. This system, already operational in Berlin, Helsinki, Stockholm, and Paris, promotes multimodal transport and reduces reliance on private vehicles.Equally important is the transformation of urban space. The «15-minute city» concept ensures essential services are reachable within 15 minutes on foot or by bike. Cities like Paris, Copenhagen, and Vancouver are redesigning public spaces to prioritize walkability, micromobility, and reduced car access in central zones.This article presents an analysis of key trends, current challenges, and development prospects of transport infrastructure in the context of growing motorization. Particular attention is given to identifying strategic pathways for transitioning toward sustainable and innovative mobility. It is emphasized that the decisions made today will have a direct impact on the quality, safety, and comfort of life in the near future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it