MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimizing Mixtures of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Robust and Bespoke Passive Atmospheric Water Harvesting

2025· article· en· W4415826894 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Engineering Au · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersOregon State UniversityArnold and Mabel Beckman FoundationConcordia UniversityResearch Corporation for Science AdvancementNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBespokeAdsorptionNanoporousAridWater vaporPassive solar building designWater balance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Atmospheric water harvesting (AWH) is a method to obtain clean water in remote or underdeveloped regions including, but not limited to, those with an arid or desert climate. For passive (i.e., relying on ambient cooling and, for heating, natural sunlight─as opposed to an external power source), adsorbent-based AWH, an adsorbent bed is employed to capture water from cold, humid air at nighttime, while during the daytime the bed is then exposed to natural sunlight to heat it and desorb the water for collection. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are tunable, nanoporous materials with suitable water adsorption properties for comprising this adsorbent bed. The water delivery by the MOF adsorbent bed in a passive AWH device depends on (1) the nighttime, capture conditions (temperature and humidity) and daytime, release conditions (temperature, humidity, and solar flux) and (2) the structure(s) of the MOF(s) comprising the bed, which dictate MOF-water interactions. Notably, the capture and release conditions vary from region-to-region and season-to-season and fluctuate from day-to-day, while different MOFs offer different water adsorption isotherms. Consequently, we propose (1) comprising the adsorbent bed for passive AWH with a mixture of MOFs and (2) tailoring this MOF mixture to particular geographic regions and time frames. We hypothesize each MOF in the mixture can specialize in delivering water under different capture and release conditions, ensuring the adsorbent bed delivers adequate water on every day─despite fluctuations in temperature, humidity, and solar flux. Herein, we develop an optimization framework to determine the total mass and composition of a MOF mixture for comprising a bespoke (i.e., tailored to a declared geographic region and time frame) adsorbent bed for robust (i.e., delivering adequate water every day) passive AWH. We combine weather data in the declared region, equilibrium water adsorption data in the candidate MOFs, and thermodynamic water adsorption models (as a simplifying assumption, we neglect heat and water transfer limitations) to frame a linear program expressing our optimal design principle: adjust the mass of each candidate MOF comprising the adsorbent bed to minimize mass (important for portability and a proxy for cost) while satisfying daily water delivery constraints. Based on case studies in the Chihuahuan and Sonoran Deserts, we find (1) a mixed-MOF adsorbent bed can be, but is not always, lighter (e.g., ≈40% lighter) than the optimized single-MOF counterpart; and (2) the optimal composition and mass of the adsorbent bed differ by both geographic region and time frame. Finally, we visualize the linear program for a reduced problem with a two-dimensional design space to gain intuition, conduct a sensitivity analysis, and compare to an AWH field study. Our work is a starting point for optimizing the composition of bespoke adsorbent beds for robust, passive AWH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it