Knowledge-sharing Behaviour Through Leadership and Culture: The Moderating Role of Job Autonomy and Gender
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines how participative leadership, digital leadership and digital organizational culture influence employees’ knowledge-sharing behaviour and how these are moderated by job autonomy and gender in Malaysia. Responses from 412 employees were collected from various organizations in the tourism sector. The data analysis was conducted through PLS-SEM to test hypotheses. Participative leadership, digital leadership and digital organizational culture were found to have a significant influence on the knowledge-sharing behaviour of employees. Our results also showed that job autonomy significantly moderates the relationship between digital organizational culture and knowledge-sharing behaviour. The research revealed that gender does not moderate the influence of participative leadership, digital leadership and digital organizational culture on knowledge-sharing behaviour. The study significantly contributes to strategically deploying technology in an increasingly digital business world. The study has important theoretical and practical implications, which are presented together with suggestions for further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it