Enhancing Satellite Data Integrity Through Online Learning for Memory Dump Scheduling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Managing data downlinks through memory dump scheduling in spacecraft operations is paramount to maintaining data integrity and keeping high mission performance. Traditional static scheduling methods lack the flexibility to adapt to random events and place a significant amount of manual workload on operators. Although machine learning techniques have shown promise, they generally require large datasets and high computational resources, both of which can be limited in practice. This paper proposes to optimize time offsets for memory dump using online learning techniques, specifically, leveraging follow-the-leader strategies. These lightweight sequential algorithms are based on the intuitive idea of choosing offsets with the currently best historical performance and are known to be optimal under realistic assumptions. By integrating real-time telemetry feedback and online learning, the proposed method dynamically adjusts memory dump timings to account for variations in spacecraft operations and ground station availability, reducing the probability of data loss due to memory saturation or ground station outage. The proposed algorithm is tested using data coming from live telemetry within the mission planning system of Sentinel-6A, demonstrating its effectiveness in optimizing memory dump by showing a remarkable improvement in data key performance index. The algorithm achieved an 86% reduction in data loss relative to the loss experienced in the real-world scenario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it