MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415917066 · doi:10.1186/s12964-025-02480-w

Tankyrases modulate the hypoxia response through non-catalytic mechanisms affecting HIF-1α

2025· article· en· W4415917066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Communication and Signaling · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadJunta de AndalucíaYork UniversityMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónFundación Domingo Martínez
KeywordsGene silencingHIF1AHypoxia (environmental)AngiogenesisLuciferasemicroRNAPolysomeMessenger RNACellular adaptation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Adaptation to hypoxia is essential for cancer survival and is linked to poor prognosis and treatment resistance. This adaptation triggers the expression of genes that promote angiogenesis and metabolic reprogramming, collectively enhancing cancer cell survival, tumor growth, migration and metastasis. Consequently, there is an urgent need for innovative strategies to inhibit tumor adaptation to hypoxic conditions. METHODS: The public database cBioPortal was utilized to analyze tankyrase mRNA alteration profiles across various cancer types, and the correlation between TNKS/2 and HIF1A expression was assessed using the GEPIA platform. The effects of TNKS1/2 inhibition or silencing on HIF-1α stabilization and activation were evaluated through western blotting and RT-qPCR analysis of HIF-target genes. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of tankyrase elimination on hypoxia-driven gene expression, RNA-seq was also conducted. The effects on cell fitness and the functional consequences of tankyrase silencing in tumor cell adaptation to hypoxia were examined by measuring glycolysis through ECAR and lactate assays, along with apoptosis, colony formation and migration and invasion assays. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which tankyrases influence hypoxic signaling, we employed a range of approaches, including polysome profiling, mRNA half-life assays, reporter luciferase assays to analyze the HIF-1α promoter, and proximity ligation assays to explore the effect of tankyrase elimination on the interaction between HIF-1α and its inhibitory protein FIH-1. RESULTS: In the present study, we investigated the role of TNKS1 and TNKS2 as modulators of the hypoxic response. Notably, we found that tankyrases participate in the regulation of both HIF-1α levels (through fine-tuning HIF1A mRNA expression) and hypoxia-induced gene expression (through alteration of HIF-1α binding to FIH-1). Global RNA-seq revealed a specific impairment of the hypoxia-induced metabolic switch to glycolysis, with consequences for metabolic adaptation and cell fitness following TNKS1/2 silencing. These effects were independent of tankyrase catalytic activity. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal a novel role for tankyrases in regulating tumor cell adaptation to hypoxia. This new mechanism operates independently of their catalytic activity, underscoring the potential of strategies that target tankyrases interaction with multiple partners through the ankyrin domain and holding promise for the development of new therapeutic advances to counter tumor adaptation to hypoxia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it