MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415928898 · doi:10.33395/sinkron.v9i4.15299

Integrating K-Means Clustering and Apriori for Data Mining-Based Digital Marketing Strategy For Increasing UMKM: Study Case Stabat City

2025· article· W4415928898 on OpenAlexaff
Adek Maulidya, Selfira Selfira, Gomgom Sidabutar, Reyva Ryo Al Hafiz

Bibliographic record

VenueSinkrOn · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer churn and segmentation
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssociation rule learningCluster analysisAffinity analysisTransaction dataMarket segmentationDatabase marketingDatabase transactionApriori algorithmProduct (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) or UMKM in Bahasa are play a crucial role in regional economic development, yet they often face challenges in designing effective marketing strategies due to limited access to advanced analytical tools. Digital marketing supported by data mining offers a solution to this problem by enabling more precise customer segmentation and product bundling recommendations. This study aims to integrate K-Means clustering and Apriori association rule mining to develop data-driven marketing strategies for MSMEs in Stabat City, Indonesia, with a specific focus on rice sales data. A dataset consisting of 1,000 rice sales transactions was processed through a multi-stage methodology, including data preprocessing, clustering, and association rule generation. The Elbow and Silhouette methods suggested an optimal cluster number of k = 3, resulting in three distinct customer groups: (1) loyal high-value buyers, (2) price-sensitive buyers, and (3) premium-oriented buyers. Descriptive statistics highlighted differences in average transaction values, purchase frequency, and brand preferences across clusters. Apriori analysis produced the top ten significant association rules, such as {Medium Rice} → {Pandan Wangi Rice} with support = 0.14, confidence = 0.68, and lift = 1.23. Promotional simulations showed that generic discount campaigns could increase sales by approximately 3.0%, whereas targeted bundling strategies yielded smaller short-term gains (+1.53%) but offered stronger long-term potential, particularly for premium-oriented clusters. These findings are consistent with prior international studies, where customer segmentation combined with market basket analysis has proven effective for enhancing digital marketing outcomes. The study concludes that integrating clustering and association rules can provide MSMEs with actionable insights to optimize promotional strategies and improve competitiveness. However, limitations remain, including the relatively small dataset, reliance on manual parameter selection, and simplified modeling assumptions. Future research should expand to multi-sector datasets and explore advanced algorithms to validate and extend these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSinkrOnSame topicCustomer churn and segmentationFrench-language works237,207