MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415958133 · doi:10.3102/10769986251379738

Valid Standard Errors for Bayesian Quantile Regression With Clustered and Independent Data

2025· article· en· W4415958133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsJackknife resamplingFrequentist inferenceMarkov chain Monte CarloEstimatorQuantileQuantile regressionStandard errorBayesian probabilityPoint estimationOutlier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bayesian quantile regression typically uses the asymmetric Laplace distribution as working likelihood, not because it is a plausible data-generating distribution but because the corresponding maximum likelihood estimator is identical to the classical estimator by Koenker and Bassett. While point estimation is consistent, credible intervals tend to have poor frequentist coverage. We propose using infinitesimal jackknife (IJ) standard errors introduced by Giordano and Broderick, which do not require resampling and can be obtained from a single Markov chain Monte Carlo run. Simulations and applications to real data show that IJ standard errors have good frequentist properties for both independent and clustered data. We provide an R package, IJSE, that computes IJ standard errors after estimation of any model with the brms wrapper for Stan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.505
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it