From 5G RAN Queue Dynamics to Playback: A Performance Analysis for QUIC Video Streaming
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid adoption of QUIC as a transport protocol has transformed content delivery by reducing latency, enhancing congestion control (CC), and enabling more efficient multiplexing. With the advent of 5G networks, which support ultra-low latency and high bandwidth, streaming high-resolution video at 4K and beyond has become increasingly viable. However, optimizing Quality of Experience (QoE) in mobile networks remains challenging due to the complex interactions among Adaptive Bit Rate (ABR) schemes at the application layer, CC algorithms at the transport layer, and Radio Link Control (RLC) queuing at the link layer in the 5G network. While prior studies have largely examined these components in isolation, this work presents a comprehensive analysis of the impact of modern active queue management (AQM) strategies, such as RED and L4S, on video streaming over diverse QUIC implementations—focusing particularly on their interaction with the RLC buffer in 5G environments and the interplay between CC algorithms and ABR schemes. Our findings demonstrate that the effectiveness of AQM strategies in improving video streaming QoE is intrinsically linked to their dynamic interaction with QUIC implementations, CC algorithms and ABR schemes—highlighting that isolated optimizations are insufficient. This intricate interdependence necessitates holistic, cross-layer adaptive mechanisms capable of real-time coordination between network, transport and application layers, which are crucial for leveraging the capabilities of 5G networks to deliver robust, adaptive, and high-quality video.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it