MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416091488 · doi:10.1016/j.ic.2025.105378

Approximation algorithms for the maximum path cover problem using long paths

2025· article· en· W4416091488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation and Computation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsApproximation algorithmPath (computing)Cover (algebra)Matching (statistics)Approximation theoryStability (learning theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem studied in this paper is to find a collection of vertex-disjoint paths in a given graph G = ( V , E ) such that each path has length at least k , called a long path, and the total number of edges on these paths is maximized. The problem is NP-hard for any fixed k or when k is part of the input, by a reduction from the Hamiltonian path problem. Berman and Karpinski presented a 7/6-approximation algorithm for k = 1 , but for a general k ≥ 2 , there is no approximation algorithm directly for the problem. We present the first local search ( 0.4394 k + O ( 1 ) ) -approximation algorithm for any fixed k ≥ 1 , and a 1.4254-approximation algorithm for k = 2 built on top of a maximum triangle-free path-cycle cover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it