MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416091488 · doi:10.1016/j.ic.2025.105378

Approximation algorithms for the maximum path cover problem using long paths

2025· article· en· W4416091488 on OpenAlexafffund
Mingyang Gong, Yong Chen, Guohui Lin, Bing Su, Lusheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInformation and Computation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsApproximation algorithmPath (computing)Cover (algebra)Matching (statistics)Approximation theoryStability (learning theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem studied in this paper is to find a collection of vertex-disjoint paths in a given graph G = ( V , E ) such that each path has length at least k , called a long path, and the total number of edges on these paths is maximized. The problem is NP-hard for any fixed k or when k is part of the input, by a reduction from the Hamiltonian path problem. Berman and Karpinski presented a 7/6-approximation algorithm for k = 1 , but for a general k ≥ 2 , there is no approximation algorithm directly for the problem. We present the first local search ( 0.4394 k + O ( 1 ) ) -approximation algorithm for any fixed k ≥ 1 , and a 1.4254-approximation algorithm for k = 2 built on top of a maximum triangle-free path-cycle cover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInformation and ComputationSame topicComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsFrench-language works237,207