MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416148053 · doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.11.002

Polymer blends as a tool to improve mechanical properties and printability of metal-filled polymer filaments for material extrusion additive manufacturing in the context of sustainable manufacturing

2025· article· en· W4416148053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Processes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsResearch CanadaÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsExtrusionFused filament fabricationComposite numberContext (archaeology)PolymerMetal injection moldingShrinkageSinteringPorosityParticle (ecology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study reports the development and optimization of highly metal-loaded thermoplastic composite filaments for material extrusion additive manufacturing of metallic components. Nickel (Ni) and iron (Fe) powders with varying particle sizes and morphologies were combined with polyethylene (PE), polylactic acid (PLA), and PE/PLA blends as binders. The influence of particle characteristics and binder composition on filament morphology, mechanical properties, porosity, thermal behavior, and printability was systematically investigated. Composite filaments containing up to 90 wt% Ni and 80 wt% Fe were successfully extruded. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that fine Ni particles improved dispersion and reduced porosity, whereas coarse Fe particles resulted in heterogeneous packing. Thermal analyses guided debinding and sintering conditions, while mechanical testing demonstrated that PE enhanced flexibility, PLA contributed to strength, and blended systems offered a balanced compromise with good printability. Optimized 3D printing parameters enabled the fabrication of high-quality green parts, which were successfully debound and sintered using graphite powder to suppress oxidation. Dense metallic structures with controlled shrinkage and minimal residual porosity were obtained. Ni-based samples exhibited greater shrinkage and cracking due to finer particle size and higher thermal expansion. The results demonstrate a robust materials–process design strategy for FFF of metals. Unlike conventional multi-step solvent-based methods, this work employs a simple dry-mixing route and standard laboratory furnace processing without vacuum or inert atmospheres. This streamlined approach provides an environmentally friendly and scalable pathway for additive manufacturing of high-performance metallic parts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it