MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416289485 · doi:10.1086/738219

Molecular Artifacts: Whiteness and the Genetics of the Ancient Dead

2025· article· en· W4416289485 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIsis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRace, Genetics, and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAncient DNAIncarnationPoliticsHuman geneticsWhite (mutation)Ancient egyptRace (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ancient DNA (aDNA) studies of the human past are only the most recent version of a subfield of genetics initiated in 1934: paleoserology, which aimed to determine “blood groups of the ancient dead” from their remaining tissue or bone. This article argues that the origins of human paleoserology – and its newer incarnation as aDNA research – are deeply entangled with a specific racial debate over the purported whiteness or Blackness of the ancient Egyptians. The varying political and intellectual stakes of this debate for American, European, West African, and Egyptian scientists shaped the development of new technologies for genetic research, prompted conflicts over access to the mummified remains of ancient Egyptians, and ultimately defined genetics as a tool to search for the roots of a white European genealogy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it