MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mining and e-waste recycling influence the spatial distribution of technology-critical elements, but not rare earth elements, in boreal lakes

2025· article· en· W4416292590 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGroupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologieFondation de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-TémiscamingueCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
KeywordsContext (archaeology)BorealBiomonitoringSpatial distributionWater qualitySedimentDistribution (mathematics)SmeltingSpatial variability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mining and more recent e-waste recycling have contributed trace elements (TEs) to the environment. However, the occurrence of emerging technology-critical elements (TCEs), including rare earth elements (REEs), remains poorly reported. Our study aims to i) investigate the spatial distribution of TEs, including TCEs, across different environmental matrices; ii) compare measured concentrations in water and sediment against environmental quality guidelines; and iii) assess potential risks to human health from fish consumption. In this study, we sampled water, sediment, and fish tissues (muscle and liver) across six boreal lakes near the historically mining region of Rouyn-Noranda, home to North America's largest copper smelting and recycling facility (Horne Smelter). Concentrations of TEs (e.g., Cu, Se) were higher in lakes closest to the smelter. Similarly, some TCEs (i.e., Ti, Co, Tl) followed this same spatial distribution pattern, suggesting that their release may be linked to historical and current mining activities. Conversely, REEs displayed distinct spatial patterns, likely influenced by geological sources rather than pollution. Several TEs (e.g., Zn, Cd, Pb) exceeded Canadian water and sediment quality guidelines in lakes closer to the mining area. Muscle tissue from walleye or yellow perch showed Zn, Cd, or Pb concentrations above safety limits in at least one lake. This study highlights the importance of including emerging TCEs (e.g., Sr, Tl, Co) in biomonitoring programs. Our findings provide critical insights into the environmental distribution of TEs across multiple matrices of boreal lake ecosystems, contributing to global efforts in risk assessment and sustainable freshwater management in the context of growing electronic waste recycling. • First report of various TCEs and REEs in 3 matrices of boreal lakes • The spatial distribution of several newly reported TCEs is similar to historical TEs • REE concentrations are associated with geology rather than mining sources • Some TE concentrations in water and sediment are above guidelines in closest lakes • All lakes exceeded safety limits for at least one element (Zn, Cd, or Pb) in the muscle tissue

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it