MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416303743 · doi:10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.110496

Overcoming barriers and expanding opportunities in liver transplantation in Mexico

2025· article· en· W4416303743 on OpenAlexaff
Jose Alonso Avila-Rojo, Froylan David Martínez‐Sánchez, Luis Alejandro Rosales-Rentería, David Aguirre-Villarreal, Alan G. Contreras, Rodrigo Cruz-Martinez, Maximiliano Servín-Rojas, Alejandro Ramírez-del Val, Daniel Zamora‐Valdés, Pilar Leal‐Leyte, Jonathan Aguirre-Valádez, Víctor M. Páez-Zayas, Aczel Sánchez-Cedillo, Alejandro Lugo‐Baruqui, Joshue David Covarrubias-Esquer, Francisco Isai Garcia-Juarez, Isaac Ruiz, Ignacio García‐Juárez

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiver transplantationDonationLatin AmericansPandemicPublic healthTransplantationOrgan donationUnited Network for Organ SharingHepatitis C

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Although Mexico has made important strides in surgical capacity and institutional development, the country continues to report one of the lowest LT rates in Latin America. Multiple challenges remain, including inequitable access to care, limited organ donation, and structural inefficiencies in allocation systems. To review the current status of LT in Mexico, describe historical trends, highlight significant barriers to progress, and discuss potential opportunities for program expansion. We conducted a narrative review incorporating data from the National Transplant Center (Centro Nacional de Trasplantes in Spanish), relevant peer-reviewed literature, and global benchmarks. The analysis focused on trends in liver transplant volume, donor types, etiology shifts, institutional disparities, and the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. LT activity in Mexico increased from 25 transplants in 1999 to 297 in 2023. However, over 68% of transplants are concentrated in Mexico City, and only eight centers perform more than ten LTs per year. Deceased donors account for most grafts, while living donor transplants remain rare and mostly limited to private institutions. The national waiting list functions primarily as a registry rather than a priority-based allocation system. The COVID-19 pandemic further disrupted transplant programs, particularly in the public sector. Innovative approaches such as donation after circulatory death, hepatitis C virus-positive donor utilization, and advanced perfusion technologies are currently unavailable or underutilized in Mexico. Mexico's LT system faces geographic, regulatory, and resource-related limitations. To improve outcomes and ensure equitable access, strategic reforms focused on donor expansion, centralized allocation, perfusion technologies, and standardization of care are urgently needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of TransplantationSame topicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207