MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416358133 · doi:10.4000/1561q

Retracer l’héritage autochtone louisianais dans les collections françaises (xviiie-xxie siècles)

2025· article· W4416358133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGradhiva · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCabinet (room)Patron saintWest indiesNova scotia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le musée du quai Branly–Jacques Chirac conserve un ensemble très significatif d’objets nord-amérindiens issus de la colonisation de la vallée du Mississippi au xviiie siècle, dont la provenance est mal documentée. Cet article revient sur un corpus attribuable à la région du bas Mississippi, notamment à la culture choctaw, identifié grâce à une recherche croisant sources historiques, inventaires révolutionnaires et savoirs traditionnels. L’étude s’appuie notamment sur l’examen du cabinet de curiosités d’Antoine-Denis Raudot (1679-1737), co-intendant de la Nouvelle-France entre 1705 et 1710, acquis ensuite par le prince de Condé et transféré au château de Chantilly avant d’être saisi à la Révolution. Ce travail, loin d’être achevé, propose une démarche collaborative et évolutive pour redonner une voix aux objets issus de la Louisiane coloniale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it