MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416420387 · doi:10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100287

Leveraging digital twins for enhanced sustainable warehouse management

2025· article· en· W4416420387 on OpenAlexaff
Adnane Drissi Elbouzidi, Rosin. Frédéric, Robert Pellerin, Samir Lamouri

Bibliographic record

VenueCleaner Logistics and Supply Chain · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData warehouseSustainabilityCarbon footprintWarehouseGreenhouse gasManagement accountingAggregate (composite)Cost accountingAccounting information system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warehouses are increasingly under pressure to reduce their carbon footprint. Yet, traditional carbon accounting approaches remain ill-suited to support real-time or operational decision-making dedicated to lower their environmental impacts. These methods typically rely on aggregated, static data and offer vague emission estimates. To address this issue, this paper introduces a bottom-up carbon accounting framework embedded within a warehouse Digital Twin (DT), enabling real-time, resource-level emissions tracking and scenario analysis. The framework builds upon the Toyota Business Practices (TBP) method to analyze the results of traditional carbon accounting by integrating data streams from Warehouse Management Systems (WMS) and sensor inputs into DT simulation modules to allocate emissions at the level of equipment and processes. A case study conducted in a 3PL warehouse in France demonstrates the model’s ability to match aggregate estimates from conventional carbon accounting (CCA) tools, while delivering substantially higher resolution. Notably, the DT identified overlooked emission hotspots, including employee commuting and the use of packaging materials made from wood and plastic, to support operational “what-if” analysis and evaluate the carbon and cost trade-offs of alternative scenarios. These findings highlight the potential of Warehouse DTs to shift carbon accounting from a static reporting function to an actionable sustainability management tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCleaner Logistics and Supply ChainSame topicDigital Transformation in IndustryFrench-language works237,207