MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416420438 · doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2025.100811

SAMSort: Vision foundation model for sorting construction and demolition waste

2025· article· en· W4416420438 on OpenAlexaff
Ruoxin Wang, Chi Fai Cheung, Yiman Jiang, Dongxing Xuan, Chi Sun Poon

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopments in the Built Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee
KeywordsDemolition wasteSortingDemolitionIntersection (aeronautics)Adaptation (eye)LimitingConstruction wasteSorting algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The rapid growth of construction and demolition waste (CDW) poses significant challenges to environmental sustainability and the availability of land resources, particularly in densely populated cities like Hong Kong, highlighting the urgent need for efficient waste sorting and recycling techniques. Traditional CDW sorting facilities (CWSFs) rely heavily on manual and mechanical operations, which are labour-intensive, costly, and often inefficient. Recent advances in computer vision offers new opportunities for automating CDW sorting, yet most existing models require large training datasets, substantial computational resources, and generally cannot estimate the precise area proportion of each waste category, limiting their practical deployment. To address these challenges, this paper introduces SAMSort, a novel framework that adapts the Segment Anything Model (SAM) for CDW sorting through parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). Six types of PEFT layers, including transformer adapter, attention adapter, multilayer perceptron adapter, and three variants of low-rank adaptation (LoRA Types I–III), are adopted to reduce the number of trainable parameters. In addition, the performance of all 24 possible combinations is evaluated. A new dataset collected from Tseung Kwan O (TKO) CWSF is constructed for model training and evaluation. The results show that SAMSort achieves competitive waste sorting performance, with an F1-score of 0.764 and an Intersection of Union (IoU) of 0.670 using only 1% of the parameters required for full fine-tuning. ➢ A construction waste sorting method based on the vision foundation model is developed for construction and demolition waste ➢ Six types of parameter-efficient fine-tuning layers are built for model adaptation ➢ A dataset is built based on the sorting data acquired from a sorting site at Tseung Kwan O for model training and evaluation ➢ The model achieves competitive waste sorting performance with 1% of the parameters

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopments in the Built EnvironmentSame topicRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceFrench-language works237,207