MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416427640 · doi:10.1016/j.ceja.2025.100958

Modelling Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: A review of applications using genetic algorithms and hybrid GA–based models

2025· article· en· W4416427640 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Journal Advances · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProcess (computing)Key (lock)Renewable energyGenetic algorithmSensitivity (control systems)Process modelingProduct (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global transition toward sustainable energy production has intensified interest in clean fuel technologies derived from renewable organic materials, including biomass. Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) plays a crucial role in this shift as a key part of converting coal, natural gas, and biomass into transportation fuels and long-chain hydrocarbons, such as diesel and waxes. However, optimising the FTS process is highly challenging due to its sensitivity to multiple operational parameters, including temperature, pressure, gas flow rate, reactant ratio, catalyst type, and formulation method. Traditional deterministic models struggle to effectively capture the complex reaction mechanisms underlying FTS, as multiple pathways act simultaneously with varying influence depending on catalyst properties and process conditions. To address these limitations, this review explores how genetic algorithms (GA), inspired by the process of natural selection, have been used to optimise the FTS process. It also discusses hybrid GA–based models, which combine GA with other techniques to enhance optimisation performance and modelling accuracy. It provides a detailed overview of the mathematical foundations of GA, illustrating their ability to navigate high-dimensional, multi-variable optimisation landscapes and capture non-linear interactions in process modelling. A comprehensive analysis of research published between 2000 and 2025 sourced from databases including Scopus, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and Springer focuses on identifying the key variables affecting FTS optimisation and modelling problems and demonstrating how GA and its hybrid extensions have been leveraged to optimise process conditions, particularly in terms of CO conversion, product selectivity, and hydrocarbon yield. By synthesising recent advancements and critically evaluating the strengths and limitations of GA-driven methodologies, this review highlights the potential of GA-based optimisation frameworks in advancing FTS modelling. Moreover, in alignment with the sustainability objectives of the Paris Agreement 2050, these advanced computational strategies offer promising pathways for developing more efficient, environmentally friendly, and scalable catalytic systems in energy production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it