Universal Stabilization for Maximum Entropy Optimization in Reinforcement Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In real-world decision-making tasks, it is critical for reinforcement learning (RL) methods to be both stable and robust. Maximum entropy RL methods typically generate a robust policy with entropy augmented reward. While incorporating entropy into the reward offers the benefit of exploration, it presents limited universal applicability and persistent convergence difficulties, such as suboptimal policy stabilization and unstable $Q$ value update. From optimization, we define these two issues as tremulous policy and spiky Q-function, investigating their underlying causes and relationships. Analysis with this, the maximum entropy principle leads to a spiky $Q$ -function update, which ultimately results in a tremulous policy. We thus introduce a beta-symmetric Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence objective to mitigate such issues under the maximum entropy framework. With this objective function, the tremulous nature of the policy could be controlled with a large beta value. The spiky $Q$ -function could be avoided by annealing the entropy in the target $Q$ value, as the beta-symmetric KL divergence is an upper bound of the original reverse KL divergence. Theoretically, we prove that minimizing our new objective function results in a new policy that presents an improvement in the $Q$ value. Guaranteed by these results, we ultimately derive the optimal policy by iteratively updating the $Q$ value and policy, and we call this method max-entropy stable optimization (MeSO). Experimental results on the Mujoco and Roboschool platforms demonstrate that our algorithm maintains stability while offering better flexibility and overall performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it